Operative Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization: Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adolescents

SLR - August 2022 - Jian Zeng, DPM

Reference: Martus JE. Operative Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization: Tibial Shaft Fractures in Adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jul 1;41(Suppl 1):S33-S38. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001806. PMID: 34096535.

Level of evidence: 4

Scientific Literature Review

Reviewed by: Jian Zeng, DPM
Residency Program: Mercy Health – St. Vincent’s Medical Center

Podiatric Relevance: It is crucial to understand the management algorithm of pediatric trauma because children have very different anatomy. Tibial shaft fractures occur commonly in adolescence due to their soft bone quality. It has been controversial whether to treat these fractures conservatively or surgically. Surgery can better stabilize the fracture than casting, however it has a high risk of nonhealing and delayed healing. The author wrote this article with thorough literature review and his own clinical expertise. He discussed various treatment plans with different scenarios.  

Methods: The author typed in key words such as “tibial shaft fracture” and “adolescent” in PubMed search bar with the time frame filter from 1970 to 2020. The author narrowed down to 27 articles from different journals. Only literatures demonstrate the management options, complications, and outcome of adolescence tibial fracture were included. Studies not in English, case reports and expert opinion were excluded. 

Results: Ideal alignment for tibia was clearly defined which are 10-15 degrees of sagittal angulation, 5 degrees of coronal angulation and 10-15 mm shortening. Casting is suitable for non-displaced fracture. Cast wedging can be performed 2-3 weeks after the injury. A total of 12 week immobilization is required for healing. Physician can switch from long leg casting to patella tendon bearing casting. Casting can be very cost-effective and scar-free. Within casting patients, 20-40% of them might still require surgeries. Operative treatment was necessary in several occasions including: degloving injury, vascular injury, compartment syndrome, ipsilateral femoral fractures, and polytrauma. Operative treatment also applies to obese patients when casting is not stable or suitable. Flexible IM nailing decreases infection rate and avoids growth plate but has a higher chance of delayed union and malunion as well as same amount of immobilization. ORIF is not recommended due to its very high risk of wound complications from dissection and delayed union. Rigid IM nailing is the standard of care because it provides rotational, angular and length stability as well as early weight bearing. It can lead to early physis arrest and anterior knee pain. External fixation is usually utilized when there is soft tissue or vascular injury as well as comminuted fracture.  

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the pros and cons of different treatments for tibial shaft fractures in adolescents. When there is compartment syndrome, severe soft tissue injuries and vascular injuries, surgical intervention is necessary. It is important to individualize treatment plans given a patient's growth plate status and radiographic findings. Ultimately, if casting fails, physicians may proceed with surgical treatment depending on patient’s history.